Summary

Portrait of Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency…

In other words, regulating the buildup of CO [ 2 ] and other greenhouse gases in the upper reaches of the atmosphere, which is alleged to be causing global climate change, is not akin to regulating the concentration of some substance that is polluting the air.
We need look no further than the dictionary for confirmation that this interpretation of "air pollution" is eminently reasonable. The definition of "pollute," of course, is " [t] o make or render impure or unclean."
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Antonin Scalia Antonin Scalia Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency…

Considering the large populations and growing economies of some developing countries, increases in their [greenhouse gas] emissions could quickly overwhelm the effects of [greenhouse [p552] gas] reduction measures in developed countries. Any potential benefit of EPA regulation could be lost to the extent other nations decided to let their emissions significantly increase in view of U.S. emissions reductions. Unavoidably, climate change raises important foreign policy issues, and it is the President's prerogative to address them.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature