Summary

Portrait of Boris Sidis Boris Sidis The Foundations of Normal and Abnormal Psychology… (1914 | notes)

Psychology, therefore, properly speaking, is not a science in the same sense as other sciences are. This objection may be easily obviated by the very simple consideration that the facts of any individual consciousness are as much objective to other people, as the chair, the table, the molecule, the atom. My individual consciousness is considered by others as external, as objective, as existing outside of their consciousness, and, in fact, were it not so, there would have been no individuality.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Boris Sidis Boris Sidis The Foundations of Normal and Abnormal Psychology… (1914 | notes)

The different objects which other sciences treat of may be regarded psychologically, and studied from the standpoint of their rise and development in consciousness. For objects to be known at all must first be perceived or conceived by consciousness. Psychology implies knowledge of the physical world as the content of consciousness. In order to know how perception and conception of objects originate, those objects must first of all be given. A thing that is not yet in existence cannot possibly be analyzed.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Boris Sidis Boris Sidis The Foundations of Normal and Abnormal Psychology… (1914 | notes)

An objection may be raised that may to some appear as a very grave one. Is psychology a science at all? Does it actually deal with objective natural existence? Physics, chemistry and other concrete sciences treat of objects, of facts, in the external world. Any one can go and verify those phenomena and their relations. This, however, is not the case with facts of consciousness, they are essentially subjective.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature