Summary

Portrait of Cesare Beccaria Cesare Beccaria An Essay on Crimes and Punishments… (1764)

That certainty which is necessary to decide that the accused is guilty, is the very same which determines every man in the most important transactions of his life.
The proofs of a crime may be divided into two classes, perfect and imperfect. I call those perfect which exclude the possibility of innocence; imperfect, those which do not exclude this possibility. Of the first, one only is sufficient for condemnation
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Cesare Beccaria Cesare Beccaria An Essay on Crimes and Punishments… (1764)

When the proofs of a crime are dependent on each other, that is, when the evidence of each witness, taken separately, proves nothing; or when all the proofs are dependent upon one, the number of proofs neither increase nor diminish the probability of the fact; for the force of the whole is no greater than the force of that on which they depend; and if this fails, they all fall to the ground. When the proofs are independent on each other, the probability of the fact increases in proportion to the number of proofs; for the falsehood of one does not diminish the veracity of another.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Cesare Beccaria Cesare Beccaria An Essay on Crimes and Punishments… (1764)

But when the crime is an offence against a fellow-subject, one half of the judges should be peers to the accused, and the other peers to the person offended. So that all private interest, which, in spite of ourselves, modifies the appearance of objects, even in the eyes of the most equitable, is counteracted, and nothing remains to turn aside the direction of truth and the laws.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature