Summary

Charles Evans Hughes Willcuts v. Bunn — Opinion of the Court

It is urged however, that a federal tax on the profits of sales of such securities should be deemed, as a practical matter, to lay such a burden on the exercise of the State's borrowing power as to make it necessary to deny to the Federal Government the constitutional authority to impose the tax. No facts as to actual consequences are brought to our attention, either by the record or by argument, showing that the inclusion in the federal tax of profits on sales of state and municipal bonds casts any appreciable burden on the State's borrowing power.
Source: Wikisource

Charles Evans Hughes Willcuts v. Bunn — Opinion of the Court

The authority of the Congress to lay a tax on the profit realized by an investor from the sale or conversion of capital assets in general is not open to dispute and is not disputed. That is a matter of governmental policy and not of constitutional power. [1] The question raised here is not because the securities sold were capital assets but because they were governmental in character.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature