Summary

Portrait of Charles Evans Whittaker Charles Evans Whittaker Allied Stores of Ohio Inc. v. Bowers…

When dealing with their proper domestic concerns, and not trenching upon the prerogatives of the National Government or violating the guaranties of the Federal Constitution, the States have the attribute of sovereign powers in devising their fiscal systems to ensure revenue and foster their local interests. Of course, the States, in the exercise of their taxing power, are subject to the requirements of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Charles Evans Whittaker Charles Evans Whittaker Allied Stores of Ohio Inc. v. Bowers…

As my Brethren's opinion makes clear, a rational basis can be found for this exercise by Ohio of the latitude permitted it to define classifications under the Equal Protection Clause. One could, in fact, be found in the concept that it is proper that those who are bound to a State by the tie of residence and accordingly the more permanently receive its benefits are proper persons to bear the primary share of its costs.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Charles Evans Whittaker Charles Evans Whittaker Allied Stores of Ohio Inc. v. Bowers…

But this is not because no rational ground can be conceived for a classification which discriminates against nonresidents solely because they are nonresidents: could not such a ground be found in the State's benign and beneficent desire to favor its own residents, to increase their prosperity at the expense of outlanders, to protect them from, and give them an advantage over, 'foreign' competition?
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature