Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Senior v. Braden — Opinion of the Court

When we speak of the jurisdiction to tax land or a chattel as being exclusively in the state where it is located, we mean no more than that, in the ordinary case of ownership of tangible property, the legal interests of ownership enjoy the benefit and protection of the laws of that state alone, and that it alone can effectively reach the interests protected for the purpose of subjecting them to the payment of the tax.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Senior v. Braden — Opinion of the Court

Whatever name we may give to the interest taxed, Ohio is not without jurisdiction of the land, the trustee, the certificates, or the owners of them. All are within the state. The objection to double taxation by a single sovereign is no more potent under the Fourteenth Amendment than the objection that a tax otherwise valid has been doubled.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Senior v. Braden — Opinion of the Court

For centuries no principle of law has won more ready or universal acceptance. Even now that it is doubted, the doubt is rested on no more substantial foundation than want of 'jurisdiction' to tax, and the assertion that the Fourteenth Amendment is endowed with a newly discovered efficacy to forbid 'double taxation' when the sovereignty imposing the tax is that of two or more states. See Farmer's Loan & Trust Co.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature