Charles Evans Whittaker

Biographical details

Portrait of Charles Evans Whittaker Charles Evans Whittaker,  Order of Railroad Telegraphers v…

“ It is obvious that any abandonment, authorized by a proper regulatory body, will result in abolishment of the jobs that were involved in the abandoned service. And inasmuch as the maintenance of these jobs constituted at least a part of the wasteful burden that necessitated the abandonment, it is equally obvious that Congress intended their abolishment. Yet, here, the Union has demanded, and threatens to force by a strike, acceptance by the carrier of a covenant that no job in existence on December 3, 1957, will be abolished without its consent. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Charles Evans Whittaker Charles Evans Whittaker,  Moore v. Terminal Railroad Association of St…

“ I submit that the simple facts recited do not show even a 'scintilla' or an 'iota' of evidence, to say nothing of any substantial evidence, of negligence by respondent. Instead, I insist, they affirmatively show that it was petitioner's own act in turning the cart at such an angle as brought its south end into collision with the moving train that was exclusively 'the cause of the injury.' Ibid.
To hold that these facts are sufficient to make a jury case of negligence under the Act is in practical effect to say that a railroad is an insurer of its employees. Such is not the law.
”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature