Charles Evans Whittaker

Charles Evans Whittaker

Summary

Portrait of Charles Evans Whittaker Charles Evans Whittaker National Labor Relations Board v…

Respondents argue that to hold these employee committees to be labor organizations would prevent employers and employees from discussing matters of mutual interest concerning the employment relationship, and would thus abridge freedom of speech in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution. But the Board's order does not impose any such bar; it merely precludes the employers from dominating, interfering with or supporting such employee committees which Congress has defined to be labor organizations.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Charles Evans Whittaker Charles Evans Whittaker National Labor Relations Board v…

On the contrary the amendment to § 9 (a) simply provides, in substance, that any individual employee or group of employees shall have the right personally to present their own grievances to their employer, and to have such grievances adjusted, without the intervention of any bargaining representative, as long as the adjustment is not inconsistent with the terms of any collective bargaining contract then in effect, provided that the bargaining representative, if there is one, has been given an opportunity to be present.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Charles Evans Whittaker Charles Evans Whittaker National Labor Relations Board v…

None of the Committees has ever attempted to negotiate a collective bargaining contract with respondents. From time to time the Board has certified independent labor organizations as the exclusive bargaining agents for certain bargaining units of employees in approximately one-third of respondents' plants, and, as such agents for those bargaining units, the respective certified labor organizations have entered into collective bargaining contracts with respondents which, as they may have been amended, are still in effect.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature