Summary

William J. Brennan, Jr. Retail Clerks International Association…

The House bill spoke of suits involving a violation of "an agreement between an employer and a labor organization or other representative of employees * * *." The Senate bill read "contracts concluded as the result of collective bargaining between an employer and a labor organization * * *." [10] It is urged that the Conference compromise upon the word "contracts" reflects a desire to use one word to cover both suits between employers and unions, and suits between unions.
Source: Wikisource

William J. Brennan, Jr. Retail Clerks International Association…

Respondents are two department stores in Toledo, Ohio, covered by the Labor Management Relations Act. For some years prior to 1957, petitioners had been the collective bargaining representatives of respondents' employees and had been parties to collective bargaining agreements with respondents. In November 1957, negotiations for renewal contracts ended in impasse. A strike ensued against one of the respondents, Lasalle's, and continued until December 24, 1958; the dispute with the other respondent, Lion Dry Goods, continued during the whole of those 13 months although no strike occurred.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature