Summary

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton United Mine Workers of America v…

The State Supreme Court's ground for sustaining the injunction was that the union, which sought to be recognized, had failed to file with the Secretary of Labor the financial and other data required by § 9 (f) and (g) , and had failed to file with the Labor Board the non-Communist affidavits required by § 9 (h) . The court held that the union, by failing to comply with § 9 (f) , (g) and (h) , had precluded its certification by the Board, and that, accordingly, neither the employees nor the union had a right to picket the plant to induce the company to recognize the noncomplying union.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton United Mine Workers of America v…

There is no provision stating that, under those circumstances, the union may not represent an appropriate unit of employees if a majority of those employees give it authority so to do. Likewise, there is no statement precluding their employer from voluntarily recognizing such a noncomplying union as their bargaining representative. Section 8 (a) (5) [6] declares it to be an unfair labor practice for an employer 'to refuse to bargain collectively with the representatives of his employees, subject to the provisions of section 9 (a) .' (Emphasis supplied.)
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton United Mine Workers of America v…

The industrial relations between the company and its employees nonetheless affect interstate commerce and come within the field occupied by the National Labor Relations Act, as amended. The Labor Board is but an agency through which Congress had authorized certain industrial relations to be supervised and enforced. The Act goes further. The instant employer, employees and union are controlled by its applicable provisions and all courts, state as well as federal, are bound by them.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature