Summary

Portrait of Charles Evans Whittaker Charles Evans Whittaker Williams v. Oklahoma — Opinion of the Court

Nor, in view of the fact that kidnaping and murder are separate and independent offenses in Oklahoma, is there any merit in petitioner's collateral claim that what he calls 'the lesser crime' of kidnaping 'merged' in what he calls 'the greater crime' of murder and that the sentence to life imprisonment for the murder was a bar to the imposition of any sentence for the kidnaping, or at least to any greater sentence than was imposed for the murder, and that imposition of a death sentence for the kidnaping deprived him of due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Charles Evans Whittaker Charles Evans Whittaker Williams v. Oklahoma — Opinion of the Court

But murder and kidnaping are not the same offense in Oklahoma. The Oklahoma statutes separately create and define the crimes of murder [7] and of kidnaping, [8] and it is evident from their terms that, as held by the Oklahoma court in this case, they create 'separate and distinct offenses.' It is not contended that the charge of murder to which petitioner pleaded guilty and was sentenced in Muskogee County made any reference to the crime of kidnaping, and the charge involved in this case made no reference to the murder but was substantially in the language of the kidnaping statute.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature