Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Quicksall v. Michigan — Opinion of the Court

And whenever said judge shall have reason to doubt the truth of such plea of guilty, it shall be his duty to vacate the same, direct a plea of not guilty to be entered and order a trial of the issue thus formed.'↑ Assertions now made concerning irregularities in the hearing on the degree of the crime were not urged before the Michigan courts. They cannot be considered here for the first time, even as to their supposed bearing on the right to counsel.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Quicksall v. Michigan — Opinion of the Court

It is now settled that as to its administration of criminal justice, a State's duty to provide counsel, so far as the United States Constitution imposes it, is but one aspect of the comprehending guaranty of the Due Process Clause of a fair hearing on an accusation, including adequate opportunity to meet it. And so we turn to the facts of this case.
By information filed in the Circuit Court for Kalamazoo County, Michigan, on July 16, 1937, Charles Quicksall, the petitioner, was charged with the murder of one Grace Parker. She was a married woman, and Quicksall was her paramour.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Quicksall v. Michigan — Opinion of the Court

On arraignment the next day before the Kalamazoo Circuit Court he pleaded guilty to the charge of murder. There is no evidence that at the time of his plea petitioner requested counsel or that appointed counsel was offered him. The circumstances attending the plea were thus formally stated by the judge who received it:
'The record may show that this respondent (petitioner) has just offered to plead guilty and has pleaded guilty to a charge of murder
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature