Summary

Portrait of Charles Evans Whittaker Charles Evans Whittaker Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company v…

The abstract assignment of a status to goods which are to be used in manufacture is certainly not germane to an evaluation of that physical transformation of the goods which has hitherto been required before an import could become vulnerable to state taxes. To say that goods are necessary to meet requirements merely asserts a truism which is equally applicable in every case this Court has decided under the Import Clause.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Charles Evans Whittaker Charles Evans Whittaker Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company v…

Whether foreign goods are receiving a tax advantage over similar domestic goods can only be determined by an evaluation of the full range of imposts and duties which the importer has been required to pay to the National Government. Only then can we know, as a matter of economic reality, whether, in fact, there is discrimination. And if we find discrimination, it is the result of the decision of the Congress and the President that the goods involved should, as a matter of national policy, receive preferential treatment.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Charles Evans Whittaker Charles Evans Whittaker Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company v…

We have not the basis for knowledge as to what, if any, processing the ore underwent when removed to the stock bins. There is certainly no basis for assigning a hypothetical constitutional position to the removed ore, and using such an argumentative figment as the means for upholding the tax on the ore about which we do have the precise facts and whose immunity is the question before us.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature