Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Hooven Allison Company v. Evatt…

The United States is committed to a policy of granting complete independence to the Philippines. It has already granted their people and their officials a large measure of autonomy. But until the sovereignty of the United States is finally withdrawn, the United States retains plenary and unrestricted powers over them and is responsible for their welfare.
We have as a nation exhibited an ideal and a selfless concern for the well-being of the Philippine people, a concern that has been deepened by the devastation that war has brought to their land.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Hooven Allison Company v. Evatt…

Unless we are to ignore the constitutional prohibition we cannot say that imports for manufacture are not entitled to the immunity which the Constitution commands, and we see no theoretical or practical grounds for saying, more than in the case of goods imported for sale, that the immunity ends while they are in the original package and before they are devoted to the purpose for which they were imported.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Hooven Allison Company v. Evatt…

It is evident, too, that if the tax immunity of imports, commanded by the Constitution, is to be reconciled with the right of the states to tax goods after their importation has become complete and they have become a part of the common mass of property within a state, 'there must be a point of time when the prohibition ceases, and the power of the state to tax commences.' Brown v.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature