“ I think collaboration on era's such as Category:Ancient Egyptian works would work well; definitely worth trying. I think subjective groupings would be less useful, as the subjectivity could detract from the brute force aspect of a collaboration effort. Wikisource:Slavery isnt overly subjective, but it starts CotW on a slippery slope. Another suggestion along those lines is picking a large project (like EB1911) as a CotW to inject a fresh set of ideas and effort. I see a lot of unfinished works lying around that could be finished within a week if the work is divided between a few people. ”

“ Sherurcij Collaboration of the Week: Author:Richard Francis Burton 06:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC) I was hoping that with some effort on our behalf to kick things off, and do some examples, it would bring in a set of Wikipedians that would otherwise be uninterested in Wikisource. These newcomers are likely to be good contributors as they would be very concerned about fidelity. ”

“ The chief problem I see is a lack of online texts (technically a good thing, since we don't just want to be a Gutenberg mirror) - though if we could find hardcopies I'd be happy to scan/OCR them and parse them for WS - so if any of you have any books by Stables lying around - let me know, otherwise are there any other "prolific" authors of such "pulp adventure" who currently dono't have any/many works on WS? ”