Summary

David Davis Secombe v. Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad Company…

The constitution of Minnesota provides that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; and this means a judicial trial. It is not necessary to assert in this case that a trial by jury is an essential part of that judicial trial. But it is absolutely necessary that there should be a proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction, and that the party to be affected by the proceeding should be summoned into that court and have notice of the object of the proceeding.
Source: Wikisource

David Davis Secombe v. Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad Company…

Paul and Pacific Railroad Company, which in the case of the St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company v. Parcher, [3] the Supreme Court of Minnesota held good and constitutional. That court considered that although corporations could not be formed by special act, yet that the State could buy the property including the franchise-or right to be a corporation of a corporation already created-and could hold without a merger, if it was for its interest and it desired to do so, the franchise which it had thus bought.
Source: Wikisource

David Davis Secombe v. Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad Company…

The judgment of condemnation in this case was rendered by a competent court, charged with a special statutory jurisdiction, and all the facts necessary to the exercise of this jurisdiction are shown to exist. A judgment thus obtained is no more subject to impeachment in a collateral proceeding than the judgment of any other court of exclusive jurisdiction. [5]
If it were so, railroad companies would have no assurance that the steps taken by them to procure the right of way would conclude any one, and they would be constantly subject to vexatious litigation.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature