Summary

David Davis The Patapsco (80 U.S. 329) — Opinion of the Court

Entries in books are always explainable, and the truth of the transaction can be shown independent of them. The form of charge in any book of original entries does not appear, as the day-book was not called for by the claimants, nor are the 'invoices' which the libellant was directed to furnish with the coal produced. But, from the form of entry in the journal itself (where the amount furnished to each vessel is set opposite to its name) , we are led to the conclusion that the day-book entries which are thus journalized were debited to each steamer by name.
Source: Wikisource

David Davis The Patapsco (80 U.S. 329) — Opinion of the Court

It is equally free from dispute that the supply of coal was necessary-indeed, indispensable-to enable her to make her voyage at all. In such a case the inference is, that the credit was given to the vessel, unless it can be inferred that the master had funds, or the owners had credit, and that the materialman knew of this, or knew such facts as should have put him on inquiry. [1] There is no reason to suppose that the master had funds, or the owners of the line credit, nor that the libellant was guilty of laches.
Source: Wikisource

David Davis The Patapsco (80 U.S. 329) — Opinion of the Court

The company running the steamers was a distant corporation, of no established name, and without personal liability in case the enterprise recently undertaken should prove a failure, and it is hard to believe that a large and intelligent coal merchant in Baltimore, in dealing with this corporation, intended to renounce his claim against the steamers in case he was not paid. It is very clear that there was no credit to the company at the time of sale, because the coal was sold for cash at the lowest market price.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature