Summary

Nathan Clifford New York and Liverpool United States Mail Steamship Company v…

Few cases can be imagined where it is more needful that they should be observed than when a steamer and a sailing vessel are approaching each other from opposite directions, or on interesting lines, for the obvious reason that the negligence of the one is liable to baffle the vigilance of the other; and if one of the vessels under such circumstances follows the rule, and the other omits to do so, or violates it, a collision is almost certain to follow.
Source: Wikisource

Nathan Clifford New York and Liverpool United States Mail Steamship Company v…

At the time of the disaster she was fifteen or twenty miles off the southern shore of Long Island, sailing close hauled on the wind, with her larboard tacks aboard, and all her sails set, and was heading about northwest by west. While sailing on that course, with a light wind from southwest by west, her master and crew discerned a light bearing from them about west half south, which they judged to be the light of a steamer; and the libellant, who was the master of the Alfaretta, immediately caused a light to be hoisted in the fore rigging of the brig.
Source: Wikisource

Nathan Clifford New York and Liverpool United States Mail Steamship Company v…

At all events, such an inference from the evidence is far more reasonable than would be the conclusion that all the witnesses for the libellants have wilfully perverted the truth. Other grounds of reconciling the testimony consistent with the integrity of all the witnesses might be suggested, but we think it unnecessary, as the evidence clearly shows that the brig kept her course, without any change whatever, until the peril was impending and the collision inevitable.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature