Summary

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Andes v. Ely — Opinion of the Court

But we may go further, and hold that attaching a condition to a petition does not always, and necessarily, vitiate it. A subscription by a municipality to the stock of a railroad company stands upon a different footing from one made by an individual. In the latter case it is a mere transaction for purposes of pecuniary gain, and there is no limitation on the right of the individual to subscribe to the stock of any railroad corporation, no matter where such corporation proposes to build its road.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Andes v. Ely — Opinion of the Court

There is no evidence of any challenge on the part of the state of the validity, of the corporate franchises assumed to exist, and exercised by the company. In view of these considerations, it is impossible now to recognize as valid the claim that by reason of the supposed defect in the original incorporation all the acts of the town, in respect to the issue of bonds, the subscription to and the receiving of stock, were void.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Andes v. Ely — Opinion of the Court

Is it not fair to hold that the petition was at the time of its presentation an unconditional petition on the part of all the signers? There was in fact no limitation or restriction on the express request of all the petitioners for the issue of the bonds. At least, when such a petition was presented, it was within the competency of the county judge to hear and determine whether or no the conditions named had been performed. The petition called for some action. The duty of judicial inquiry arose, and there can be no judicial inquiry without jurisdiction.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature