Summary

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Louisville St. Company v. Wilson…

The parties who, acting under the intervenor's advice, took such steps as to secure their advances, and thereby obtained equity of interest with the lienholders, should pay him. They who are compelled to let third parties into an equality with themselves in the matter of security ought not to be compelled to pay counsel who brought about such equality.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Louisville St. Company v. Wilson…

An attorney of an individual, retained for a single suit, is not his employe. It is true, he has engaged to render services; but his engagement is rather that of a contractor than that of an employe. The services of appellee, therefore, did not come within the order appointing the receiver. We would not be understood as asserting, even by implication, that the terms of an order of appointment of a receiver vest in all claimants an absolute right as against the security holders. Such terms may be, and doubtless are, a protection to the receiver
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature