Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Gordon v. Washington — Opinion of the Court

The sole relief prayed by the bills was the appointment of receivers and the command of the court that property, shown to be in the lawful possession of the petitioner acting as a temporary trustee or fiduciary, be surrendered to them. A receivership is only a means to reach some legitimate end sought through the exercise of the power of a court of equity. It is not an end in itself.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Gordon v. Washington — Opinion of the Court

Respondents are not shown to be creditors, much less judgment creditors. As beneficiaries of the fiduciary relationship of the trust company, and later of the secretary, to the mortgage pools, they failed to allege misconduct or neglect on which any equitable relief could be predicated. They did not show that there was any danger to the assets of the mortgage pools, or to their management, which would be avoided or removed by the appointment of receivers.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature