Summary

Earl W. Stevick Adapting and Writing Language Lessons… (1971)

What is in the course has no connection with anything that really matters to the student. Words are connected to words (either Sarkhanese or English) and patterns are connected to patterns, but there is no feel or motion, no touch, no smell, no flavor and no joy. There are no people yet, only teachers and students. There is no flesh, but only dry bones.
Source: Wikisource

Earl W. Stevick Adapting and Writing Language Lessons… (1971)

SARKHANESE COURSE
1. Prepare a sketch of the language. Make it short enough so that an interested layman can read it at one sitting, and clear enough so that he won't get up and leave it. Make it long enough so that a student can relate to it most of the grammatical features that he finds in ordinary written or spoken texts, but don't try to make it exhaustive. Write from the point of view of the student, not of the linguistic scientist. (That is why the sketch is part of 'coarse presentation' rather than 'fine specification'!)
Source: Wikisource

Earl W. Stevick Adapting and Writing Language Lessons… (1971)

To have let the poultry raiser, anthropologist, and linguistic scientist into the picture too soon would have led to disproportionate influence of their theoretical preoccupations and past experiences, and a disastrous loss in validity relative to the interests of the future audience. To allow them to remain in the picture after fine specification has been completed is to invite those same professional preoccupations to distort the teachability of the end product.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature