Summary

Edward Bickersteth The conscience clause: a letter to His Grace the Duke of Marlborough… (1867)

Every one must see the difference between the Clergyman admitting the Dissenter's child into his School on sufferance, and the Dissenter demanding admission for his child as a matter of right. The School would no longer be the Parochial School presided over by the Clergyman. If a Dissenter demands that the whole of the religious teaching be withheld from his child, another may do likewise, and another; and thus, so far as the relaxation reaches, a simply secular education would take the place of the religious.
Source: Wikisource

Edward Bickersteth The conscience clause: a letter to His Grace the Duke of Marlborough… (1867)

The real and practical difficulty arises in those parishes which are unable to support two Schools, but which contain a certain proportion of Dissenters, whose children have no alternative but the Church School. In parishes such as I describe, wherever the Clergyman exercises a liberal discretion, and receives into his School the children of Dissenters for such portions of the teaching as the parents do not object to, (and in the vast majority of cases they object to none of it,) the difficulty does not arise.
Source: Wikisource

Edward Bickersteth The conscience clause: a letter to His Grace the Duke of Marlborough… (1867)

They refuse, on principle, to admit into their Schools any children until they have been baptized; they make the full teaching of the Church a sine quâ non throughout the School, and they require every child, without exception, to attend the Sunday School. If my own practice differs from this, it is not because I do not highly appreciate and respect the motives of those who adopt the stricter rule. I can quite imagine the case of parishes in which such a course may be pursued with advantage
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature