Summary

Edward Douglass White Ambrosio Apapas v. United States…

But assuming, for argument's sake, the premise based on the treaty to be sound, and disregarding, for brevity's sake, the fact that the accused were tribal Indians, leading a tribal life, and living on a tribal reservation under the control of the United States, the deduction based on the premise is so absolutely devoid of merit as not in any real sense to involve the construction of the treaty.
Source: Wikisource

Edward Douglass White Ambrosio Apapas v. United States…

In other words, we do not hold that any and every objection to the admission of a statement or confession of an accused can be made to involve the construction of the Constitution merely be referring to that instrument when in substance and effect there is no controversy concerning the Constitution, but only a contention as to the methods of procedure.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature