Edward Douglass White

Summary

Edward Douglass White Stuart v. Easton (170 U.S. 383…

The authority to the trustees, being to 'purchase,' adds force to the clear implication that it was the intention of the assembly that a title in fee simple should be acquired. When, therefore, we find a recital in the patent that it is conveyed upon a named consideration, and the patent expressly refers to the act of the assembly as the authority from which the patentees derived the power to take and hold the property, we naturally infer an intention of the parties on the one hand to convey, and on the other to receive, just such an estate in the land as the act contemplated.
Source: Wikisource

Edward Douglass White Stuart v. Easton (170 U.S. 383…

On the part of the defendants in error it was contended that the transaction was a purchase, and not a trust. The court said (page 506) :
'The doctrine of charitable use is inapplicable to a question like the present. Had the ancestors of the plaintiff conveyed the property as a gratuity, to be used in a particular way, they might have had a plausible case on a cessation of the user; but he conveyed it for its value, by an absolute deed, to persons who executed a declaration of trust, not for his benefit, but to vest the equitable ownership in the county.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature