Summary

Edward Douglass White United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt-Actien Gesellschaft…

The United States, on January 4th, 1911, commenced this suit to prevent the further execution of an agreement to which the defendants were parties and which it was charged constituted the foundation of an illegal combination in violation of the anti-trust act (26 Stat. at L. 209, chap. 647, Comp. Stat. 1913, § 8820) . The relief asked, moreover, in the nature of things embraced certain subsidiary agreements made during the course of the execution of the main contract, in furtherance of its alleged prohibited result.
Source: Wikisource

Edward Douglass White United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt-Actien Gesellschaft…

Each line undertakes to arrange its rates and service in such manner that the number of steerage passengers it actually carries shall correspond as nearly as possible with the number allotted to it by the contract. If any line exceeds its proportion it is in duty bound to adopt measures calculated to bring about a correct adjustment.
Source: Wikisource

Edward Douglass White United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt-Actien Gesellschaft…

When, in determining such rights, it becomes necessary to give an opinion upon a question of law, that opinion may have weight as a precedent for future decisions. But the court is not empowered to decide moot questions or abstract propositions, or to declare, for the government of future cases, principles or rules of law which cannot affect the result as to the thing in issue in the case before it.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature