Summary

Portrait of Edward Terry Sanford Edward Terry Sanford Madera Sugar Pine Company v. Industrial Accident Commission of California…

Provision is universally made in workmen's compensation acts for compensation not only to disabled employees but to the dependents of those whose injuries are fatal. And the two kinds of payment are 'always regarded as component parts of a single system of rights and liabilities arising out of' the relation of employer and employee.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Edward Terry Sanford Edward Terry Sanford Madera Sugar Pine Company v. Industrial Accident Commission of California…

The argument is, in substance, that while an employer may lawfully be compelled to make compensation to the resident dependents of employees whose death was caused by no legal wrong, on the ground that the State is interested in preventing such dependents from becoming public charges, this justification does not extent to the case of foreign dependents, who would not become public charges of the State; and, therefore, that an act requiring compensation to be made to such foreign dependents in the absence of legal wrong, is not a reasonable exercise of the police power of the State.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Edward Terry Sanford Edward Terry Sanford Madera Sugar Pine Company v. Industrial Accident Commission of California…

If an employment be such as to fall within the State's law-making jurisdiction and the Legislature determines that the employment of labor therein entails upon the employer certain responsibilities toward the persons performing the labor and those dependent on them, there is no constitutional provision requiring that the benefits of such legislative scheme be limited to citizens or residents of the State.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature