Summary

Portrait of Edward Terry Sanford Edward Terry Sanford Sheehan Company v. Shuler — Opinion of the Court

Taking the fact that accidental injuries are inevitable, in connection with the impossibility of foreseeing when, or in what particular plant or industry they will occur, we deem that the state acted within its power in declaring that no employer should conduct such an industry without making stated and fairly apportioned contributions adequate to maintain a public fund for indemnifying injured employees and the dependents of those killed, irrespective of the particular plant in which the accident might happen to occur.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Edward Terry Sanford Edward Terry Sanford Sheehan Company v. Shuler — Opinion of the Court

In such a case, however, as in the case of an injury requiring vocational rehabilitation, it is the theory of the law that such additional compensation to the injured employee should not be required of the particular employer in whose service the injury occurred, but should be provided out of general funds created by payments required of all employers when injuries resulting in the death of their own employees leaving no beneficiaries, do not otherwise create any liability under the Compensation Law.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature