Summary

Portrait of Ernest Belfort Bax Ernest Belfort Bax The Legal Subjection of Men — THE CIVIL LAW (1908)

This is quite apart from the peculiar privilege of women to waste a man's time and money in a pretended engagement, possibily to lure on a more wealthy lover—and to be exempt from penalty. Their privilege to commit perjury and slander with impunity plays a great part in the decision of any case in which a woman's contract is concerned. All stockbrokers, insurance agents, solicitors, and bankers, and business men generally, know how hopeless, as a rule, is any prospect of getting a contract enforced against a woman.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Ernest Belfort Bax Ernest Belfort Bax The Legal Subjection of Men — THE CIVIL LAW (1908)

A married woman, as already pointed out, although rolling in wealth and owning tens of thousands a year, even when separated and released from all duty to her husband and children, retains her privilege of having her property exempt from seizure for debt. Some very amusing cases—amusing that is to all except the male litigant—of rich women refusing to pay traders and solicitors will be present to the public mind.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Ernest Belfort Bax Ernest Belfort Bax The Legal Subjection of Men — THE CIVIL LAW (1908)

Exactly as in breaches of contract, it is usually wise to submit to the injustice.
But the rising wave of pro-feminist sentiment has reached a curious height of late years. A woman can accuse a man of sexual irregularities with absolute impunity. But it is not to be supposed that he is to have a like privilege. A special statute (Slander of Women Act) passed a few years ago, makes such slander of a woman actionable. But she retains her privilege of slandering a man. If this be not a statutory sex-privilege words must have lost their meaning.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature