Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Kingsley Books v. Brown — Opinion of the Court

We need not linger over the suggestion that something can be drawn out of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment that restricts New York to the criminal process in seeking to protect its people against the dissemination of pornography. It is not for this Court thus to limit the State in resorting to various weapons in the armory of the law. Whether proscribed conduct is to be visited by a criminal prosecution or by a qui tam action or by an injunction or by some or all of these remedies in combination, is a matter within the legislature's range of choice.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Kingsley Books v. Brown — Opinion of the Court

The supreme court has jurisdiction to enjoin the sale or distribution of obscene prints and articles, as hereinafter specified:↑ This comparison of remedies takes note of the fact that we do not have before us a case where, although the issue of obscenity is ultimately decided in favor of the bookseller, the State nevertheless attempts to punish him for disobedience of the interim injunction. For all we know, New York may impliedly condition the temporary injunction so as not to subject the bookseller to a charge of contempt if he prevails on the issue of obscenity.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature