Francis Hueffer and Donald Francis Tovey

Summary

Francis Hueffer and Donald Francis Tovey 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 12… (1911)

Again, the sense of orchestral climax shown in the oracle scene in Alceste was a thing inconceivable in older music, and unsurpassed in artistic and dramatic spirit by any modern composer. Its influence in Mozart’s Idomeneo is obvious at a first glance.
The capacity for broad melody always implies a true sense of form, whether that be developed by skill or not; and thus Gluck, in rejecting the convenient formalities of older styles of opera, was not, like some reformers, without something better to substitute for them.
Source: Wikisource

Francis Hueffer and Donald Francis Tovey 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 12… (1911)

Indeed only a great musician could so reform opera as to give it scope for dramatic power at all. Where Gluck differs from the greatest musicians is in his absolute dependence on literature for his inspiration. Where his librettist failed him (as in his last complete work, Écho et Narcisse) , he could hardly write tolerably good music; and, even in the finest works of his French period, the less emotional situations are sometimes set to music which has little interest except as a document in the history of the art.
Source: Wikisource

Francis Hueffer and Donald Francis Tovey 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 12… (1911)

Moreover, in both cases the libretti, though skilfully managed, tell a rather more complicated story than those which Gluck had hitherto so successfully treated; and, where inspiration fails, the musical technique becomes curiously amateurish without any corresponding naïveté. Still these works are immortal, and their finest passages are equal to anything in Alceste and Orfeo. Écho et Narcisse we must, like Gluck’s contemporaries, regard as a failure.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature