Summary

Portrait of François Rabelais François Rabelais Pantagruel — ~ How Pantagruel judged so equitably of a controversy… (1532)

But Pantagruel said unto them, Are the two lords between whom this debate and process is yet living? It was answered him, Yes. To what a devil, then, said he, serve so many paltry heaps and bundles of papers and copies which you give me? Is it not better to hear their controversy from their own mouths whilst they are face to face before us, than to read these vile fopperies, which are nothing but trumperies, deceits, diabolical cozenages of Cepola, pernicious slights and subversions of equity?
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of François Rabelais François Rabelais Pantagruel — ~ How Pantagruel judged so equitably of a controversy… (1532)

You have heard much talking of that worthy personage named Master Pantagruel, who hath been found to be learned above the capacity of this present age, by the proofs he gave in those great disputations which he held publicly against all men. My opinion is, that we send for him to confer with him about this business; for never any man will encompass the bringing of it to an end if he do it not.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of François Rabelais François Rabelais Pantagruel — ~ How Pantagruel judged so equitably of a controversy… (1532)

But the foresaid Du Douhet held the contrary opinion, maintaining that Pantagruel had said well, and what was right, in affirming that these records, bills of inquest, replies, rejoinders, exceptions, depositions, and other such diableries of truth-entangling writs, were but engines wherewith to overthrow justice and unnecessarily to prolong such suits as did depend before them; and that, therefore, the devil would carry them all away to hell if they did not take another course and proceeded not in times coming according to the prescripts of evangelical and philosophical equity.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature