Frederick Cornwallis Conybeare

Frederick Cornwallis Conybeare

Summary

Portrait of Frederick Cornwallis Conybeare Frederick Cornwallis Conybeare 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica (1911)

It remains to say that classical Armenian resembles rather the modern idiom of Van than of western Armenia. It was a plastic and noble language, capable of rendering faithfully, yet not servilely, the Greek Bible and Greek fathers. Often the Armenian translators, and especially after the 5th century, rendered word for word, preserving the order of the Greek. This literalness, though unpleasing from a literary standpoint, gives to many of their ancient versions the value almost of a Greek codex of the age in which the version was made.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Frederick Cornwallis Conybeare Frederick Cornwallis Conybeare 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica (1911)

It will be realized from the above enumeration of works written in each century that Armenian literature was purely monkish. There was no epic or romance literature; although this was not lacking in the contiguous country of Georgia, where there seem to have always been knights and ladies willing to read and keep alive a literature of poetry and narrative, not altogether suitable for monks, and more akin to Persian literature.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature