Summary

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Marx v. Hanthorn — Opinion of the Court

It is not in the power of any American legislature to deprive one of his property by making his adversary's claim to it, whatever that claim may be, conclusive of its own validity. It cannot, therefore, make the tax deed conclusive evidence of the holder's title to the land, or of the possible jurisdictional facts which would make out title.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Marx v. Hanthorn — Opinion of the Court

The view of the court was that notice of the sale was an essential part of the proceedings; that the legislature did not have the power to make the tax deed conclusive evidence of the fact; that there must be an opportunity given for investigation and trial; and that the legislature cannot, under the pretense of prescribing rules of evidence, preclude a party from making proof of his right by arbitrarily and unreasonably declaring that, on some particular circumstance being shown by the other party, the controversy is closed by a conclusive presumption in favor of the latter.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature