Summary

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. United States v. Elliott — Opinion of the Court

The theory of the government is that the life tenant was so far a trustee or representative of the remainder-men that when he purchased at the public sale, in 1866, he acted as well for those in remainder as for himself. To sustain this view, the counsel for the United States point to the numerous cases in which it has been held that a tenant for life cannot purchase for himself at a tax sale, or acquire an interest adverse to the reversioner or remainder-man by obtaining an assignment of the tax title.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature