Summary

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Wetmore v. Rymer — Opinion of the Court

When such a question arises in an action at law, its decision would usually depend upon matters of fact, and also usually involves a denial of formal, but necessary, allegations contained in the plaintiff's declaration or complaint. Such a case would be presented when the plaintiff's allegation that the controversy was between citizens of different states, or when, as in the present case, the allegation that the matter in dispute was of sufficient value to give the court jurisdiction, was denied.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Wetmore v. Rymer — Opinion of the Court

The question whether the land in dispute was of a value sufficient to give the circuit court jurisdiction was purely one of fact, and as that question was not submitted to the jury, but was passed on by the court upon affidavit, it is now suggested that, upon a writ of error, this court cannot consider the facts disclosed by the affidavits, but is restricted to any errors of law shown by the record.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Wetmore v. Rymer — Opinion of the Court

A liberal presumption ought therefore to be indulged in favor of the plaintiffs' evidence in that regard. It is well known that there is no matter in respect to which the judgments of men more widely differ than in regard to the value of real estate.
We give no weight to that portion of the plaintiffs' evidence that goes to show damage to the balance of their lands by an adverse occupancy of the land claimed by the defendants.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature