Summary

George Sutherland Ozark Pipe Line Corporation v. Monier…

Surely the tax upon the corporate franchise is as indirect as the tax upon the pipe line.
I find in the commerce clause no warrant for thus putting a state to the choice of either abandoning the corporate franchise tax or discriminating against intrastate commerce, [4] nor for denying to a state the right to encourage the conduct of business by natural persons through imposing, for the enjoyment of the corporate privilege, an annual tax so small that it cannot conceivably be deemed an obstruction of interstate commerce.
Source: Wikisource

George Sutherland Ozark Pipe Line Corporation v. Monier…

The tax is held void solely on the ground that it is obnoxious to the commerce clause. A state tax is obnoxious to that provision of the federal Constitution only if the directly burdens interstate commerce, or (where the burden is indirect) if it obstructs or discriminates against such commerce. Here there is no contention that, in fact, the tax assessed either obstructs, or appreciably burdens, interstate commerce. The tax is trifling in amount. [1] There is no contention that, in fact, the tax discriminates against interstate commerce.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature