Gilbert Keith Chesterton

Gilbert Keith Chesterton

Summary

Portrait of Gilbert Keith Chesterton Gilbert Keith Chesterton The Apostle and the Wild Ducks… (1975)

I need not repeat for the hundredth time that the case against communism is not a case for capitalism; indeed the case against communism is that it is much too like capitalism. It matters little whether our allegorical hotel is called by capitalists an hotel or by communists a hostel. The case against it is that it is not a home, and that the spirit of man will never feel at home in it. It can only be a home when it has a sense of something at once restful and capricious, which is the mood of all creative action.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Gilbert Keith Chesterton Gilbert Keith Chesterton The Apostle and the Wild Ducks… (1975)

The hotel might multiply its chairs by the million, it might vary its pattern of chairs by the thousand, but it would never come into the same world as that perverse and personal day-dream of turning a chair, first into a stool and then into a stage. In that world are all the wonders of the creative side of property; and though I have taken for convenience the lighter and more portable types of property, the same psychology applies to the larger business of production. A man wishes to own his field, primarily because its productiveness is the protection of his honour and independence
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Gilbert Keith Chesterton Gilbert Keith Chesterton The Apostle and the Wild Ducks… (1975)

In the matter of property we may find an obvious but useful parable in the difference between living in a house and living in an hotel. There are some practical conveniences in the hotel; but there is first of all a sort of megalomaniac glamour of great spaces and gilded ceilings that is not practical at all. At best there is the romance of personal adventure and accident; but there is no corporate and communal life.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature