Griffin Smith

Summary

Griffin Smith,  Cole v. State (1946)

“ This motion was denied because the Court thought (as it said in refusing to give defendants' requested Instructon No. 11) , "a threat is an element of violence".
So, it will be seen, the trial was conducted upon the assumption that, although the indictment did not allege threats were made, evidence of threats was admissible to prove the use of force and violence—because, as the Judge stated, "a threat is an element of violence". Certainly a threat of bodily harm or material damage or serious inconvenence may, in certain circumstances, become an element of violence
”
Source: Wikisource

Griffin Smith,  Cole v. State (1947)

“ That case was decided when the Constitution of 1868 was in effect, its provision being that “. . . no person, after having been once acquitted by a jury, forthe same offense shall be again put in jeopardy of life or liberty.” The Constitution of 1874 is: “. . . and no person, for the same offense, shall be twice put in jeopardy of life or liberty.” Effect of the case is that dismissal of a valid indictment against one who insists upon trial before a jury then sworn amounted to an acquittal, and a plea of former jeopardy was good against a second indictment for the same offense. ”
Source: Wikisource

Griffin Smith,  Cole v. State (1946)

“ Quoting from the Gurein case, the State emphasizes that part of the opinion that says " . . . if a conspiracy exists to do an unlawful act, any and all acts of any one of the conspirators in furtherance of the conspiracy is admissible against all person shown to be parties to the conspiracy". It is then said in the State's brief: "The facts in that case appear to us to be identical to those in the case at bar".
If it be assumed that, in practical effect, facts here and in the Gurein case were similar, still we havd not disposed of differences between the information and the indictment.
”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature