Guy C. H. Corliss

Guy C. H. Corliss

Summary

Portrait of Guy C. H. Corliss Guy C. H. Corliss North Dakota Reports

There is no force in the position that the defendant, having received the benefit of the teacher's services, is liable. Such a doctrine would defeat the policy of the law, which is to give the people of the state the benefit of trained and competent teachers. The law recognizes only one evidence that that policy has been regarded—the certificate of qualification.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Guy C. H. Corliss Guy C. H. Corliss North Dakota Reports

While it was at first supposed that a state court could determine for itself the question of diverse citizenship, (Dunne v. Railroad Co. 27 N. W. Rep. 448, and cases cited,) it is now settled law that when a prima facie case for removal is presented the state court instantly loses jurisdiction; that it has no power to determine the fact of diverse citizenship; and that any action on its part will be without jurisdiction, even though the case is not in fact transferable, and the petition for removal is false.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Guy C. H. Corliss Guy C. H. Corliss North Dakota Reports

The supremacy of the laws of the United States might in this regard be utterly destroyed by the hostile action of the courts of a subordinate sovereignty, if the fact on which the operation of these laws to give the federal courts jurisdiction depended rested for its final determination on the decision of the tribunals of such subordinate sovereignty.
The fact that the plaintiff was appointed administrator in the territory of Dakota, and is now administrator in this state, does not alter the case. The question is one of personal citizenship. The individual can have no official citizenship.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature