Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Douglas v. City of Jeannette — Opinion of the Court

Far less should a federal court of equity attempt to envisage in advance all the diverse issues which could engage the attention of state courts in prosecutions of Jehovah's Witnesses for violations of the present ordinance, or assume to draw to a federal court the determination of those issues in advance, by a decree saying in what circumstances and conditions the application of the city ordinance will be deemed to abridge freedom of speech and religion.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Douglas v. City of Jeannette — Opinion of the Court

Allegations of fact sufficient to show deprivation of the right of free speech under the First Amendment are sufficient to establish deprivation of a constitutional right guaranteed by the Fourteenth, and to state a cause of action under the Civil Rights Act, whenever it appears that the abridgment of the right is effected under color of a state statute or ordinance.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Douglas v. City of Jeannette — Opinion of the Court

It is a familiar rule that courts of equity do not ordinarily restrain criminal prosecutions. No person is immune from prosecution in good faith for his alleged criminal acts. Its imminence, even though alleged to be in violation of constitutional guarantees, is not a ground for equity relief since the lawfulness or constitutionality of the statute or ordinance on which the prosecution is based may be determined as readily in the criminal case as in a suit for an injunction.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature