Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Hardware Dealers' Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Wisconsin v…

The present statute substitutes a determination by arbitration for trial in court of the single issue of the amount of loss suffered under a fire insurance policy. As appellant's objection to it is directed specifically to the power of the state to substitute the one remedy for the other, rather than to the constitutionality of the particular procedure prescribed or followed before the arbitrators, it suffices to say that the procedure by which rights may be enforced and wrongs remedied is peculiarly a subject of state regulation and control.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Hardware Dealers' Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Wisconsin v…

We cannot assume that the Minnesota Legislature did not have knowledge of conditions supporting its judgment that the legislation was in the public interest, and it is enough that, when the statute is read in the light of circumstances generally known to attend the recovery of fire insurance losses, the possibility of a rational basis for the legislative judgment is not excluded.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature