Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company…

Petitioner argues that the death, resulting from voluntary exposure to the sun's rays under normal conditions, was accidental in the common or popular sense of the term, and should therefore be held to be within the liability clauses of the policies. But it is not enough, to establish liability under these clauses, that the death or injury was accidental in the understanding of the average man-that the result of the exposure 'was something unforeseen, unexpected, extraordinary, an unlooked-for mishap, and so an accident,' see Lewis v.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company…

On the other hand, an effect which is not the natural or probable consequence of the means which produced it, an effect which does not ordinarily follow and cannot be reasonably anticipated from the use of those means, an effect which the actor did not intend to produce and which he cannot be charged with the design of producing under the maxim to which we have adverted, is produced by accidental means.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature