Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Southern Paco v. State Of Arizona Sullivan…

The decisive question is whether in the circumstances the total effect of the law as a safety measure in reducing accidents and casualties is so slight or problematical as not to outweigh the national interest in keeping interstate commerce free from interferences which seriously impede it and subject it to local regulation which does not have a uniform effect on the interstate train journey which it interrupts.
The principal source of danger of accident from increased length of trains is the resulting increase of 'slack action' of the train.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Southern Paco v. State Of Arizona Sullivan…

For a hundred years it has been accepted constitutional doctrine that the commerce clause, without the aid of Congressional legislation, thus affords some protection from state legislation inimical to the national commerce, and that in such cases, where Congress has not acted, this Court, and not the state legislature, is under the commerce clause the final arbiter of the competing demands of state and national interests.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature