Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Sowell v. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Texas…

The contention of plaintiff in error that suit should have been stayed until defendant in error had exhausted its other collateral is not founded upon any special equities growing out of fraud, agreement among the parties, or suretyship, or other special relationship, giving rise to any equity in the maker of the note. The note was held by defendant in error, together with other collateral, as security for the debt of the payee who is insolvent and indebted to plaintiff in error in an amount exceeding the note.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Sowell v. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Texas…

In that case, the court, in holding that the Bank of the United States might bring suit on a note indorsed to it by a citizen of the same state as that of the defendant maker of the note, pointed out that the purpose of the assignee clause was to prevent extending the jurisdiction of the court by the mere process of assignment and not to limit a jurisdiction conferred on other grounds.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature