Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Viereck v. United States — Dissent

As the House and Senate Committees considering the Bill said, it 'does not in any way impair the right of freedom of speech, or of a free press, or other constitutional rights.' Resting on the fundamental constitutional principle that our people, adequately informed, may be trusted to distinguish between the true and the false, the bill is intended to label information of foreign origin so that hearers and readers may not be deceived by the belief that the information comes from a disinterested source.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Viereck v. United States — Dissent

As a practical matter, the very fact that in the instant case it is extremely difficult to determine with conviction which activities the petitioner carried on in his own behalf and which he carried on in behalf of Germany is reason enough for requiring him to report on both. The Act did not contemplate that a foreign agent could evade its terms by claiming that all unreported political activities, upon their discovery by this government, were undertaken on his own behalf.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature