Potter Stewart,
Braden v. United States — Opinion of the Court
“ At the trial the district judge determined as a matter of law that the questions were pertinent to a matter under inquiry by the subcommittee, [5] leaving to the jury the question whether the pertinence of the questions had been brought home to the petitioner. It is to be noted that counsel made no timely objection to this procedure and, indeed, affirmatively acquiesced in it. [6] But we need not base rejection of the petitioner's contention here on that ground, for, in any event, it was proper for the court to determine the question as a matter of law. ”
