Summary

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton Savorgnan v. United States — Opinion of the Court

Temporary or limited duality of citizenship has arisen inevitably from differences in the laws of the respective nations as to when naturalization and expatriation shall become effective. There is nothing, however, in the Act of 1907 that implies a congressional intent that, after an American citizen has performed an overt act which spells expatriation under the wording of the statute, he, nevertheless, can preserve for himself a duality of citizenship by showing his intent or understanding to have been contrary to the usual legal consequences of such an act.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton Savorgnan v. United States — Opinion of the Court

What was the effect upon the petitioner's American citizenship of her applyingfor and obtaining Italian citizenship?
The requirements for expatriation under § 2 of the Citizenship Act of 1907 are objective. [8] That section provides that 'any American citizen shall be deemed to have expatriated himself when he has been naturalized in any foreign state in conformity with its laws, or when he has taken an oath of allegiance to any foreign state.' [9]
Traditionally the United States has supported the right of expatriation as a natural and inherent right of all people.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton Savorgnan v. United States — Opinion of the Court

The United States has long recognized the general undesirability of dual allegiances. Since 1795, Congress has required any alien seeking American citizenship to declare 'that he both absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty whatever, and particularly by name, the prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, whereof he was before a citizen or subject
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature