Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Schneider v. Rusk (377 U.S. 163…

The protection of American citizens abroad has always been a most sensitive matter and continues to be so today. This is especially true in Belgium, Greece, France, Iran, Israel, Switzerland and Turkey, because of their refusal to recognize the expatriation of their nationals to acquire American citizenship. The dissension that springs up in some of these areas adds immeasurably to the difficulty.
Nor is the United States alone in making residence abroad cause for expatriation.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Schneider v. Rusk (377 U.S. 163…

If Congress has the power to expatriate all citizens, as the Court's position implies, it would certainly have like power to enact a more narrowly confined statute aimed only at those citizens whose presence in their native homelands can embroil the United States in conflict with such countries. As the history shows, the naturalized citizen who returns to his homeland is often the cause of the difficulties.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Schneider v. Rusk (377 U.S. 163…

Residence of United States nationals abroad has always been the source of much international friction and the ruling today will expand these difficulties tremendously. In 1962 alone 919 person were expatriated on the basis of residence in countries of former nationality. The action of the Court in voiding these expatriations will cause no end of difficulties because thousands of persons living throughout the world will come under the broad sweep of the Court's decision. It is estimated that several thousand of these American expatriates reside in iron curtain countries alone.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature