Summary

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Polites v. United States — Opinion of the Court

As the District Court viewed the issue of illegal procurement in this case, there was no occasion, as in Nowak and Maisenberg, to establish by inference or imputation the petitioner's personal beliefs, his 'attachment' or lack of it. The court was concerned only with objective facts-the petitioner's membership and the Party's purpose.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Polites v. United States — Opinion of the Court

It was the claim of the petitioner's motion that Nowak and Maisenberg establish that ' (a) charge of illegal procurement of citizenship based upon alleged membership in the Communist Party, cannot be sustained where the evidence fails to show * * * that the defendant was aware that the organization was engaged in the kind of illegal advocacy proscribed by law during the period of his membership therein.' But the Nowak and Maisenberg decisions neither support nor oppose this interpretation of the 1940 Act. Those cases simply do not deal with the question.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature